<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heathenblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/16/honor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heathenblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/16/honor/</link>
	<description>Heathenry, and the religious world in which it exists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:41:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bernulf</title>
		<link>http://heathenblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/16/honor/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathenblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/16/honor/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Starfisher, thank you for your comment!

&#039;Honor and Humility&#039; is also very, very Asian and quite Western in its modern sense (if you look at the military usage of the word, it&#039;s pretty compatible with this concept of honor). My primary argument for this concept as being valid and relevant by Heathen standards has to do with honor being defined by community standards: if honor truly is determined as much by community as by the individual, then modern Heathens can be as valid approaching honor from a more internally-focused aspect as were our forebears in their more externally-focused approach :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starfisher, thank you for your comment!</p>
<p>&#8216;Honor and Humility&#8217; is also very, very Asian and quite Western in its modern sense (if you look at the military usage of the word, it&#8217;s pretty compatible with this concept of honor). My primary argument for this concept as being valid and relevant by Heathen standards has to do with honor being defined by community standards: if honor truly is determined as much by community as by the individual, then modern Heathens can be as valid approaching honor from a more internally-focused aspect as were our forebears in their more externally-focused approach :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starfisher</title>
		<link>http://heathenblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/16/honor/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Starfisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathenblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/16/honor/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Honor and Humility...very, very Wiccan! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honor and Humility&#8230;very, very Wiccan! ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
